Voice of the Frontline: The Listening Program You Already Run

Your field force is already running the best listening program in your company. You are simply not collecting it.

Every day your reps, your hub agents, your medical information team and your patient support staff watch your commercial system meet real people and fail them in specific, repeated, nameable ways. Almost none of that reaches a decision. It gets told as a story in a district meeting, nods go round the room, and it dies there.

That is the most expensive waste in your commercial budget, and fixing it costs less than one survey wave.

Why is a rep a better instrument than a survey?

Because she reports what happened rather than what someone says they think.

A survey asks a physician how she feels about prior authorization. Your rep saw the office manager stop filling in the appeal halfway through, close the file and move on. One of those is an opinion about a process. The other is the process failing, observed, with a date on it.

Think about what you are already paying for. A field visit is the most expensive research instrument in pharma, and most companies use it exclusively to talk. You fund a trained professional to sit in the room where your system is being used, and you collect nothing about what she sees there. You would never buy an observational study and throw away the observations.

The economics have got worse, which makes the waste larger. Veeva Pulse data reported by BioSpace put HCP accessibility at 45%, down from 60% eighteen months earlier. Every visit you still get is worth more than it was two years ago, and you are extracting half the value from it.

What does the frontline see that nothing else catches?

Four things, and your dashboard has none of them.

Policy changes, weeks early. A rep hits a new payer requirement the first week it bites. Claims data will show you the same thing in a quarter, after the patients are already lost.

Where the process actually breaks. Not that time to therapy is eleven days, but that the eleven days sit between the benefit check and the prior authorization submission, because each team believed the other had it.

Workarounds. When an office invents its own process to cope with yours, that is a diagnosis. Somebody has told you exactly which step is broken, in the most expensive way available, by building a bypass.

What the patient said to the nurse. You cannot talk to the patient. The nurse can, and does, and remembers. That is the closest thing to patient voice available to you in most markets, and it is sitting in your own staff's heads.

So why does none of it reach you?

Three reasons, and only the third is hard.

There is nowhere to put it. Your CRM captures what the rep said, not what she saw. There is a field for the call objective and no field for the observation, so the observation has no home and does not survive the drive back.

Nothing comes back. A rep who reports something and hears nothing reports fewer things next quarter, and nothing at all by the year after. Every listening system in history has died this way, and it is entirely predictable.

The hard one is that it gets dismissed as anecdote. Somebody senior says one rep in Ohio is not data, and they are right, which is why the fix is structural rather than cultural.

Channel preference shows the same pattern from the other side. DT Consulting's global rankings, covering 12,200 interactions with 6,100 HCPs across 13 countries, reported that pharma's use of engagement channels continues to be mismatched with HCP preferences. Your field has been saying that for years, in rooms where it did not count as evidence.

How do you turn anecdote into evidence?

By asking the same question every time and counting the answers.

One rep saying an office gave up on an appeal is a story. Four hundred reps answering a standing question about where accounts stalled this week, captured the same way, time stamped and counted, is a dataset with better coverage and faster latency than anything you can buy.

That is the whole trick. Anecdote becomes evidence through standardization, not through volume of conviction. Give the frontline a fixed, short set of things to report, make reporting take under a minute, and the aggregate carries statistical weight that no individual story ever could.

Keep it brutally small. Where did an account stall. What did the customer do about it. Was it resolved, and how long did it take.

Three things, every week, from everyone. If your capture takes longer than a minute you will get compliance theatre instead of signal, and compliance theatre is worse than silence because it looks like data.

Where should it go?

To someone who can change something that week.

Routing is where most of these programs fail quietly. Signal that lands in a quarterly insights report has arrived too late to matter. Signal that lands with a named owner of the specific seam, inside days, produces a fix that your rep then hears about, which is what keeps her reporting.

Build the loop in both directions. Capture, route, resolve, tell the person who reported it. That last step is not a courtesy. It is the mechanism that keeps the instrument alive, and it is the step everybody skips.

The operating discipline for running your field as a sensing system rather than only a delivery channel is set out in our practice note on field excellence operations.

What does this fix that surveys cannot?

The gap between what your executives believe and what your customers experience.

Deloitte's 2025 research found that only 28% of HCPs believe pharma's engagement strategies meet their needs, against 82% of life sciences executives who say they are satisfied with those same strategies. A 54 point spread does not come from a measurement error. It comes from a company whose senior people have no route to what the frontline sees every day.

The burden your frontline watches is real and documented. In the American Medical Association's latest survey, 93% of physicians said prior authorization delays care and 82% said it at least sometimes leads patients to abandon treatment. Your reps have been describing that to someone for years.

Close the route and the spread closes with it, because the argument in the room stops being about whether the problem is real.

The downstream cost is documented too. A 2026 JAMA study summarized by Johns Hopkins found insurer rejections reached 40.7% of initial brand name attempts in 2024. Your frontline watched a share of those happen in real time.

How do you know it is working?

Not by how much you collect. By what moved.

Track three things. The share of reported stalls that got an owner within a week. The time from report to resolution. Then whether barrier resolution speed, the one progression measure your field can move inside a quarter, is actually improving.

A frontline listening system that produces a rich monthly report and no change in resolution speed is the same failure as the survey program it replaced, wearing different clothes.

Hold it to the same standard as any other signal. Traceable to something a human did. Capable of capturing what moved the person rather than the story told afterwards. Scoreable against outcomes you can observe.

That test is set out in voice of the customer in pharma, and the measures it should move are in how to measure customer experience in pharma.

Get this right and you have the one listening asset your competitors cannot buy, because it runs on people you already employ, in rooms they are already in, watching a system only you can fix. Customer Excellence runs on exactly that kind of signal.

Key takeaways

  • Your field force already observes your commercial system failing, daily, and almost none of it reaches a decision.
  • A field visit is the most expensive research instrument in pharma and most companies use it only to talk.
  • The frontline catches four things nothing else does: policy changes weeks early, where the process actually breaks, customer workarounds, and what the patient said to the nurse.
  • Anecdote becomes evidence through standardization. Same short question, every week, counted and time stamped.
  • Close the loop back to the person who reported, or the instrument dies within a year.

Questions to ask your leadership team

  1. Where in your systems does a rep record something she observed rather than something she said?
  2. When a rep reported a problem last quarter, what came back to her, and how long did it take?
  3. How long after a payer policy changes does it appear in a report your brand team reads?
  4. Which three questions could every field person answer in under a minute every week?
  5. Has barrier resolution speed improved since you started collecting frontline input? If you cannot answer, you are collecting rather than listening.

About the author

Wayne Simmons is the founder of The Customer Excellence AGENCY and the author of The Customer Excellence Enterprise (Wiley, 2024). He is founding faculty of the MS in Customer Experience Management at Michigan State University's Broad College of Business. He led global customer excellence in Pfizer's first Chief Marketing Organization and in Bayer's Customer Powerhouse. Related reading: Voice of the customer in pharma, three ways to hear, Operationalizing voice of the customer and What is value leakage in pharma?

March 15, 2026
Why healthcare professionals now judge pharmaceutical engagement against the best experiences in their lives, and what that means for the future of commercial leadership. When commercial performance falters, the reflex inside many pharmaceutical organizations is to adjust the machinery of field execution. Leaders revisit call plans, recalibrate targeting models, and increase the volume of activity in the hope that more precision or more frequency will restore momentum. For decades this system has been treated as the central instrument of commercial performance, determining which physicians are prioritized, how frequently representatives engage, and how resources are deployed across territories. Yet the growing gap between commercial effort and commercial impact suggests a deeper issue. T he problem is rarely the design of the call plan itself. It is the context in which healthcare professionals now operate. Physicians are navigating increasingly complex clinical, administrative, and informational environments, and that evolving reality now shapes prescribing behavior far more than the cadence of promotional interactions. What many organizations are experiencing is a widening Customer Context Gap. Commercial systems were designed for a time when prescribing decisions could be influenced primarily through promotional interaction and product information. Today physicians operate inside a far more complex reality shaped by administrative burden, reimbursement constraints, digital information overload, and growing expectations for seamless support across the entire care journey. In this environment the physician’s decision is influenced not only by clinical evidence but also by how easily a therapy fits into the practical realities of care delivery. When commercial models remain anchored in promotional activity while the customer’s context has fundamentally changed, even the most disciplined call plan struggles to deliver the outcomes it was designed to produce. Closing this gap requires a different way of thinking about commercial performance. The question is no longer how to optimize promotional activity but how to align the organization around the real journeys through which physicians help patients receive therapy. Prescribing decisions unfold within complex sequences of clinical evaluation, reimbursement navigation, patient readiness, and ongoing support. When commercial strategy is designed around these journeys rather than isolated interactions, the role of the field force begins to evolve. Representatives are no longer positioned primarily as messengers of information but as partners in removing barriers that slow care. Organizations that recognize this shift begin redesigning their commercial systems accordingly, aligning field engagement, digital support, access programs, and patient services around the same goal: helping healthcare professionals help patients move from clinical intent to successful treatment. From Promotional Activity to Customer Journeys The pharmaceutical industry has historically organized commercial activity around the moment of promotion. Call plans, targeting models, and message sequencing were designed to influence prescribing behavior primarily through informational engagement with healthcare professionals. While this model brought structure and scale to commercial operations, it reflects an earlier era in which the path from clinical awareness to prescribing action was comparatively linear. Today the journey is far more complex. Physicians must navigate an intricate landscape of clinical evidence, treatment guidelines, payer requirements, prior authorization processes, patient affordability concerns, and adherence challenges. Prescribing a therapy is no longer a single decision point. It is the beginning of a chain of events that determines whether a patient ultimately receives and remains on treatment. This is why the commercial conversation must expand beyond the traditional moment of prescription to encompass three interconnected journeys. The first is the Path-to-Prescribe , where scientific evidence, clinical education, and confidence in the therapy shape the physician’s willingness to recommend treatment. The second is the Path-to-Fulfill, where access, affordability, patient readiness, and operational support determine whether that recommendation ultimately becomes therapy in the patient’s hands. The third is the Path-to-Adhere , where ongoing patient support, monitoring, and engagement determine whether patients remain on therapy long enough to realize the intended clinical benefit. Science drives the Path to Prescribe, where evidence, clinical education, and confidence in the therapy shape the physician’s willingness to recommend treatment. Experience shapes the Path to Fulfill, where access, affordability, and patient readiness determine whether that recommendation becomes therapy in the patient’s hands. Sustained outcomes depend on the Path to Adhere, where ongoing support, monitoring, and engagement ensure patients remain on therapy long enough to realize its intended clinical benefit. When commercial organizations focus almost exclusively on the first while leaving the latter journeys fragmented and burdened, a significant portion of therapeutic value is lost between intention and impact. In many therapeutic areas, the result appears in the persistent gap between prescriptions written, prescriptions filled, and therapies sustained—gaps that reflect not a failure of science but a failure of system design. Recognizing these three journeys shifts the unit of focus from promotional activity to the real-world pathways through which care is delivered. It reframes the role of the field force, the purpose of digital engagement, and the design of patient support programs around a single objective: reducing the friction that stands between clinical intent, treatment initiation, and sustained patient outcomes. Customer Context Is the New Commercial Variable For much of the pharmaceutical industry’s history, commercial performance was largely explained by a familiar set of variables. Product efficacy, clinical differentiation, promotional reach, and sales force execution determined the trajectory of most brands. When performance lagged, leaders adjusted those levers by refining segmentation, optimizing targeting, and recalibrating call plans. Today those traditional levers still matter, but they no longer explain commercial outcomes on their own. A far more powerful variable has entered the equation: customer context. HCPs now operate within an environment defined not only by clinical complexity and administrative burden but also by rising expectations shaped by their experiences outside healthcare. Physicians are also consumers. In their personal lives they interact daily with companies such as Apple, Amazon, Tesla, and Netflix that anticipate their needs, remove friction, and simplify complex processes through thoughtful design. These experiences quietly reset the benchmark for competence, responsiveness, and respect for their time. When those same physicians step into their clinical roles, they do not shed those expectations. They carry them with them. The contrast between the seamless orchestration of their consumer experiences and the fragmented systems surrounding many healthcare interactions becomes difficult to ignore. What once felt acceptable now feels unnecessarily burdensome. This dynamic represents the Consumer-Grade Imperative. Healthcare professionals increasingly evaluate pharmaceutical engagement not against other pharmaceutical companies but against the best experiences they encounter anywhere in their lives. In this environment even a clinically superior therapy can struggle if the surrounding system makes it difficult to initiate treatment, navigate reimbursement, or support patient adherence. Customer context therefore becomes the new commercial variable. It determines whether scientific differentiation translates into practical adoption. It shapes whether prescribing intent becomes therapy initiation and whether therapy initiation becomes sustained patient outcomes. Call plans were designed to manage activity. Customer context requires organizations to manage journeys. The Field Force in the Era of Customer Context Recognizing customer context as the defining commercial variable inevitably reshapes how the role of the field force is understood. For decades the pharmaceutical sales representative has been positioned primarily as the carrier of scientific information. Call plans optimized the frequency and sequencing of these interactions to ensure that physicians received consistent messaging. That role does not disappear, but the environment surrounding it has changed profoundly. Physicians today are navigating administrative burden, payer complexity, digital information overload, and increasing time pressure. In this environment they are not simply seeking more information. They are seeking clarity, simplicity, and support that helps them navigate the complexity surrounding treatment decisions. This shift transforms the representative from a messenger of information into something far more valuable: a partner in removing friction from the care journey. Conversations move beyond repeating clinical claims toward understanding the practical barriers that physicians and their teams face as they attempt to initiate and sustain therapy for patients. The most effective field forces are therefore supported by commercial systems designed around journeys rather than activities. Representatives are equipped not only with scientific messaging but with the insight and coordination required to address obstacles across prescribing, reimbursement, and patient support. Field engagement becomes a catalyst for problem solving rather than simply a vehicle for promotion. From Call Plans to Customer-Aligned Commercial Systems If customer context has become the defining commercial variable, then the systems designed to support the field must evolve accordingly. The traditional call plan was built to manage activity. It provided structure for how frequently physicians were engaged, how territories were covered, and how resources were deployed. Yet activity alone does not determine whether therapies ultimately reach patients. What determines impact is whether the commercial system surrounding the physician reduces or increases the burden of delivering care. A customer-aligned commercial system begins with the journeys through which physicians help patients move from diagnosis to treatment and beyond. Marketing clarifies the scientific story. Sales provides trusted relationships and real-time understanding of physician needs. Access teams simplify reimbursement pathways. Patient support programs reduce administrative burden. Digital engagement reinforces and extends human interaction. The result is a commercial system that operates less like disconnected functions and more like an integrated network designed to help physicians help patients. This is the essence of Customer Excellence. It aligns the entire commercial enterprise around the real-world context in which care is delivered. The problem was never the call plan. The problem was the context. Key Takeaways Commercial performance in pharma organizations has traditionally been managed through field execution mechanics, yet the effectiveness of those mechanics increasingly depends on how well they reflect the real-world context in which physicians operate. Customer context has become the most pivotal commercial variable as administrative burden, payer complexity, and consumer-grade expectations reshape how prescribing decisions are made. HCPs now evaluate pharmaceutical engagement against the best experiences they encounter anywhere in their lives, raising the standard for clarity, responsiveness, and ease. Optimizing promotional activity alone is no longer sufficient. Commercial success depends on reducing friction across the journeys physicians navigate as they move patients from diagnosis to treatment. Customer Excellence represents the structural response, aligning marketing, sales, access, digital engagement, and patient support around the real journeys of care delivery . Diagnostic Questions to Consider Are we optimizing the activity of our field force, or designing commercial systems that support the real journeys physicians navigate to help patients receive therapy? How well do we understand the administrative, reimbursement, and operational barriers physicians encounter after they decide to prescribe a therapy? Do our commercial systems reduce the burden placed on physicians and their staff , or unintentionally add to the complexity of care delivery? Are we benchmarking our engagement against other pharma companies , or against the best experiences physicians encounter in their lives as consumers? Have our investments in digital platforms simplified the physician’s experience, or multiplied the number of disconnected interactions they must manage? Are we still managing performance through activity metrics alone , or beginning to understand the context that ultimately determines whether therapies reach patients? Closing Reflection The pharma and life sciences industry has spent decades refining the mechanics of field execution. Call plans, segmentation models, and targeting systems brought structure and discipline to commercial organizations. Yet the environment surrounding physicians has evolved far more rapidly than the systems built to support them. Healthcare professionals now operate in a world defined by consumer-grade expectations for clarity, responsiveness, and ease. When the experience of engaging with a pharmaceutical company fails to reflect those expectations, the contrast becomes impossible to ignore. Organizations that recognize this shift will redesign their commercial systems around the realities of modern care delivery. They will move beyond managing activity and toward understanding the context in which physicians help patients receive treatment. In doing so they will close the gap between scientific innovation and real-world impact. Your breakthrough science deserves experiences worthy of it. Together, we turn customer excellence into real-world impact. About the Author Wayne Simmons is a hands-on commercial excellence architect and founder of The Customer Excellence Agency, where he partners with pharmaceutical and life sciences leaders to turn customer-centric ambition into durable commercial advantage. He previously served as Global Customer Excellence Lead within Pfizer’s Chief Marketing Organization and has held leadership roles with Bayer Pharmaceuticals and The Ritz-Carlton Leadership Center. Wayne writes The Customer-Centric Marketer newsletter and is the author of The Customer Excellence Enterprise: A Playbook for Creating Customers for Life. The Customer Excellence Agency: Advancing the Pursuit of Excellence in Service of Science.
Tan building with a hanging sign against a clear blue sky
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
Part five of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. Reconstructing the brand pyramid so that experience, not just product, carries the promise.
Coffee shop barista serving drinks behind the counter with menu boards and espresso machines.
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
Part four of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. Why corporate culture stays abstract until it is defined as a platform for delivering the experience.
Industrial-style café with large windows, people seated at tables, and a bright wooden counter
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
Part three of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. What the brand lost when it scaled, and what recapturing its mystique would require.
A starbucks logo is on the screen of a cell phone
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
Part two of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. How a highly successful digital innovation can erode the experience it was built to serve.
Starbucks sign on a beige building against a clear blue sky
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
The final part of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. How an experience delivery system is redesigned so excellence is repeatable rather than heroic.