HCP Engagement Strategy: Why Share of Voice Stopped Working

Your HCP engagement strategy is probably optimized for a world that ended around 2022. Reach and frequency. Channel mix. Share of voice. Those were the right levers when 60% of physicians would see a rep. Veeva's Pulse data put that figure at 45% in 2024 and falling. When access shrinks, the strategy that wins is not the one that squeezes more touches out of fewer doors. It is the one that makes each interaction worth the physician's time. This post lays out what that strategy looks like, what the data says about the gap between pharma and its physicians, and how to rebuild engagement around what physicians are actually trying to get done.

The gap you are engaging into

Two numbers describe it. Deloitte's 2025 research found that only 28% of HCPs believe pharma's engagement strategies meet their needs. In the same research, 82% of life sciences executives said they were satisfied with those strategies. You are, in all likelihood, in the 82%. Your physicians are in the 72% who disagree with you.

DT Consulting's benchmark, built on 12,200 rated interactions from 6,100 HCPs across 13 countries, reached a similar verdict in 2024: pharma's use of engagement channels "continues to be mismatched with HCP preferences." The mismatch is not a content problem. It is a question of what pharma thinks engagement is for. Most engagement models exist to deliver messages. Physicians engage with you to solve problems. Those are different jobs, and only one of them earns a second meeting.

What physicians are actually trying to do when they engage with you

Strip away the channel conversation and a physician's interaction with your company has a small number of purposes. She wants to know whether your therapy is right for a specific patient in front of her. She wants that patient to get the drug without a fight. She wants help when the fight happens anyway. She wants to know what to do when the patient comes back with a problem on therapy. Every one of those jobs sits in the chain from prescribing decision to treated patient, and every one of them is a place where your engagement either helps or gets in the way.

The fight happens a lot. The American Medical Association's latest physician survey found that 93% of physicians say prior authorization delays care and 82% say it at least sometimes leads patients to abandon treatment. A 2026 JAMA study summarized by Johns Hopkins found insurer rejections of brand name prescriptions reached 40.7% of initial attempts in 2024, with nearly half of those never filled within 90 days. Your physician wrote the script. She did her part. Then the system she was engaging with on your behalf let her patient fall through. That is what she remembers at the next call, whatever your message recall study says.

Why experience beats share of voice

This is not a soft argument. Bain's pharma work in 2018 found that roughly 40% of a physician's drug recommendations relate to her overall experience with the company rather than the product itself, and that physicians who rate a company highly are two to three times more likely to prescribe its products. McKinsey's launch research from the same year found fully satisfied prescribers more than twice as likely to prescribe. If your engagement strategy spends 90% of its effort on the product argument and leaves the experience to default, you are under investing in the variable that moves two fifths of the decision.

The companies that have read this evidence are changing their models. Lilly's LillyDirect and Pfizer's PfizerForAll were both built to remove the roadblocks physicians and patients hit after the prescribing decision. Novartis launched its Cosentyx direct platform in 2025 because, in the words of its US president, the company needs "new ways to reach patients more directly by removing barriers in the system." These are engagement decisions, even though nobody filed them under engagement. They change what a physician gets when she chooses your drug.

Rebuilding engagement around progression

Here is the shift in one sentence. Stop managing engagement as message delivery and start managing it as whether the physician and her patient progress to the next stage. Four practical changes follow.

Give every channel a job in the chain. The rep's job in a specialty category is rarely to deliver the efficacy story one more time. It is to know which of this physician's patients are stuck, why, and what the company can do about it this week. Medical's job is to make the clinical decision easier before it is made. Patient services' job is to make the fulfillment path visible to the office so nobody has to call to ask. When every channel has a progression job, omnichannel orchestration becomes a question of who does what for whom, rather than how many impressions you can stack. We explain that distinction in our definition of Customer Excellence.

Measure what the physician would measure. Not recall, reach or satisfaction, but time from script to first dose for her patients, how often her prior authorizations get resolved and how fast, and whether her patients are still on therapy at 90 days. If you cannot see those numbers by physician or by practice, you cannot engage on them, and you are leaving the physician to find out by herself.

Turn the field into a listening system. Reps and MSLs hear about a new payer policy, a hub bottleneck or a pharmacy problem weeks before any dashboard shows it. Most companies have no reliable way to capture that signal, classify it, assign an owner and act on it. Build that loop and the field becomes an intelligence asset as well as a delivery channel. We described the operating version of this in our practice note on journey operations for field excellence.

Make the standard explicit. Physicians judge you against the best service they received this week, not against the other reps who called. That is the Consumer-Grade standard, and it has six testable conditions: recognition, anticipation, coherence, effort, resolution and visibility. Run your current engagement model against them. Does the physician have to reintroduce her patient's situation every time she talks to a different part of your company? Does she find out a prior authorization failed from you, or from the patient? Can her office see where a case stands without calling? Every no is a place engagement is failing her, and a place a competitor can win.

Three questions for your engagement review

  1. Of the physicians you engaged most heavily last quarter, how many had patients who never started your therapy, and does anyone in your organization know why?
  2. Which of your channels has a defined job in helping a patient progress from script to first dose, and which exist only to deliver a message?
  3. When a rep hears about a recurring access barrier, where does that information go, and what happens to it?

If your engagement strategy cannot answer these, it is a promotion strategy with a different name. The physicians in Deloitte's 72% already know the difference.

About the author

Wayne Simmons is the founder of The Customer Excellence AGENCY and the author of The Customer Excellence Enterprise (Wiley, 2024). He is founding faculty of the MS in Customer Experience Management at Michigan State University's Broad College of Business. He led global customer excellence in Pfizer's first Chief Marketing Organization and in Bayer's Customer Powerhouse. Related reading: What is value leakage in pharma? and What is Consumer-Grade Pharma?

March 15, 2026
Why healthcare professionals now judge pharmaceutical engagement against the best experiences in their lives, and what that means for the future of commercial leadership. When commercial performance falters, the reflex inside many pharmaceutical organizations is to adjust the machinery of field execution. Leaders revisit call plans, recalibrate targeting models, and increase the volume of activity in the hope that more precision or more frequency will restore momentum. For decades this system has been treated as the central instrument of commercial performance, determining which physicians are prioritized, how frequently representatives engage, and how resources are deployed across territories. Yet the growing gap between commercial effort and commercial impact suggests a deeper issue. T he problem is rarely the design of the call plan itself. It is the context in which healthcare professionals now operate. Physicians are navigating increasingly complex clinical, administrative, and informational environments, and that evolving reality now shapes prescribing behavior far more than the cadence of promotional interactions. What many organizations are experiencing is a widening Customer Context Gap. Commercial systems were designed for a time when prescribing decisions could be influenced primarily through promotional interaction and product information. Today physicians operate inside a far more complex reality shaped by administrative burden, reimbursement constraints, digital information overload, and growing expectations for seamless support across the entire care journey. In this environment the physician’s decision is influenced not only by clinical evidence but also by how easily a therapy fits into the practical realities of care delivery. When commercial models remain anchored in promotional activity while the customer’s context has fundamentally changed, even the most disciplined call plan struggles to deliver the outcomes it was designed to produce. Closing this gap requires a different way of thinking about commercial performance. The question is no longer how to optimize promotional activity but how to align the organization around the real journeys through which physicians help patients receive therapy. Prescribing decisions unfold within complex sequences of clinical evaluation, reimbursement navigation, patient readiness, and ongoing support. When commercial strategy is designed around these journeys rather than isolated interactions, the role of the field force begins to evolve. Representatives are no longer positioned primarily as messengers of information but as partners in removing barriers that slow care. Organizations that recognize this shift begin redesigning their commercial systems accordingly, aligning field engagement, digital support, access programs, and patient services around the same goal: helping healthcare professionals help patients move from clinical intent to successful treatment. From Promotional Activity to Customer Journeys The pharmaceutical industry has historically organized commercial activity around the moment of promotion. Call plans, targeting models, and message sequencing were designed to influence prescribing behavior primarily through informational engagement with healthcare professionals. While this model brought structure and scale to commercial operations, it reflects an earlier era in which the path from clinical awareness to prescribing action was comparatively linear. Today the journey is far more complex. Physicians must navigate an intricate landscape of clinical evidence, treatment guidelines, payer requirements, prior authorization processes, patient affordability concerns, and adherence challenges. Prescribing a therapy is no longer a single decision point. It is the beginning of a chain of events that determines whether a patient ultimately receives and remains on treatment. This is why the commercial conversation must expand beyond the traditional moment of prescription to encompass three interconnected journeys. The first is the Path-to-Prescribe , where scientific evidence, clinical education, and confidence in the therapy shape the physician’s willingness to recommend treatment. The second is the Path-to-Fulfill, where access, affordability, patient readiness, and operational support determine whether that recommendation ultimately becomes therapy in the patient’s hands. The third is the Path-to-Adhere , where ongoing patient support, monitoring, and engagement determine whether patients remain on therapy long enough to realize the intended clinical benefit. Science drives the Path to Prescribe, where evidence, clinical education, and confidence in the therapy shape the physician’s willingness to recommend treatment. Experience shapes the Path to Fulfill, where access, affordability, and patient readiness determine whether that recommendation becomes therapy in the patient’s hands. Sustained outcomes depend on the Path to Adhere, where ongoing support, monitoring, and engagement ensure patients remain on therapy long enough to realize its intended clinical benefit. When commercial organizations focus almost exclusively on the first while leaving the latter journeys fragmented and burdened, a significant portion of therapeutic value is lost between intention and impact. In many therapeutic areas, the result appears in the persistent gap between prescriptions written, prescriptions filled, and therapies sustained—gaps that reflect not a failure of science but a failure of system design. Recognizing these three journeys shifts the unit of focus from promotional activity to the real-world pathways through which care is delivered. It reframes the role of the field force, the purpose of digital engagement, and the design of patient support programs around a single objective: reducing the friction that stands between clinical intent, treatment initiation, and sustained patient outcomes. Customer Context Is the New Commercial Variable For much of the pharmaceutical industry’s history, commercial performance was largely explained by a familiar set of variables. Product efficacy, clinical differentiation, promotional reach, and sales force execution determined the trajectory of most brands. When performance lagged, leaders adjusted those levers by refining segmentation, optimizing targeting, and recalibrating call plans. Today those traditional levers still matter, but they no longer explain commercial outcomes on their own. A far more powerful variable has entered the equation: customer context. HCPs now operate within an environment defined not only by clinical complexity and administrative burden but also by rising expectations shaped by their experiences outside healthcare. Physicians are also consumers. In their personal lives they interact daily with companies such as Apple, Amazon, Tesla, and Netflix that anticipate their needs, remove friction, and simplify complex processes through thoughtful design. These experiences quietly reset the benchmark for competence, responsiveness, and respect for their time. When those same physicians step into their clinical roles, they do not shed those expectations. They carry them with them. The contrast between the seamless orchestration of their consumer experiences and the fragmented systems surrounding many healthcare interactions becomes difficult to ignore. What once felt acceptable now feels unnecessarily burdensome. This dynamic represents the Consumer-Grade Imperative. Healthcare professionals increasingly evaluate pharmaceutical engagement not against other pharmaceutical companies but against the best experiences they encounter anywhere in their lives. In this environment even a clinically superior therapy can struggle if the surrounding system makes it difficult to initiate treatment, navigate reimbursement, or support patient adherence. Customer context therefore becomes the new commercial variable. It determines whether scientific differentiation translates into practical adoption. It shapes whether prescribing intent becomes therapy initiation and whether therapy initiation becomes sustained patient outcomes. Call plans were designed to manage activity. Customer context requires organizations to manage journeys. The Field Force in the Era of Customer Context Recognizing customer context as the defining commercial variable inevitably reshapes how the role of the field force is understood. For decades the pharmaceutical sales representative has been positioned primarily as the carrier of scientific information. Call plans optimized the frequency and sequencing of these interactions to ensure that physicians received consistent messaging. That role does not disappear, but the environment surrounding it has changed profoundly. Physicians today are navigating administrative burden, payer complexity, digital information overload, and increasing time pressure. In this environment they are not simply seeking more information. They are seeking clarity, simplicity, and support that helps them navigate the complexity surrounding treatment decisions. This shift transforms the representative from a messenger of information into something far more valuable: a partner in removing friction from the care journey. Conversations move beyond repeating clinical claims toward understanding the practical barriers that physicians and their teams face as they attempt to initiate and sustain therapy for patients. The most effective field forces are therefore supported by commercial systems designed around journeys rather than activities. Representatives are equipped not only with scientific messaging but with the insight and coordination required to address obstacles across prescribing, reimbursement, and patient support. Field engagement becomes a catalyst for problem solving rather than simply a vehicle for promotion. From Call Plans to Customer-Aligned Commercial Systems If customer context has become the defining commercial variable, then the systems designed to support the field must evolve accordingly. The traditional call plan was built to manage activity. It provided structure for how frequently physicians were engaged, how territories were covered, and how resources were deployed. Yet activity alone does not determine whether therapies ultimately reach patients. What determines impact is whether the commercial system surrounding the physician reduces or increases the burden of delivering care. A customer-aligned commercial system begins with the journeys through which physicians help patients move from diagnosis to treatment and beyond. Marketing clarifies the scientific story. Sales provides trusted relationships and real-time understanding of physician needs. Access teams simplify reimbursement pathways. Patient support programs reduce administrative burden. Digital engagement reinforces and extends human interaction. The result is a commercial system that operates less like disconnected functions and more like an integrated network designed to help physicians help patients. This is the essence of Customer Excellence. It aligns the entire commercial enterprise around the real-world context in which care is delivered. The problem was never the call plan. The problem was the context. Key Takeaways Commercial performance in pharma organizations has traditionally been managed through field execution mechanics, yet the effectiveness of those mechanics increasingly depends on how well they reflect the real-world context in which physicians operate. Customer context has become the most pivotal commercial variable as administrative burden, payer complexity, and consumer-grade expectations reshape how prescribing decisions are made. HCPs now evaluate pharmaceutical engagement against the best experiences they encounter anywhere in their lives, raising the standard for clarity, responsiveness, and ease. Optimizing promotional activity alone is no longer sufficient. Commercial success depends on reducing friction across the journeys physicians navigate as they move patients from diagnosis to treatment. Customer Excellence represents the structural response, aligning marketing, sales, access, digital engagement, and patient support around the real journeys of care delivery . Diagnostic Questions to Consider Are we optimizing the activity of our field force, or designing commercial systems that support the real journeys physicians navigate to help patients receive therapy? How well do we understand the administrative, reimbursement, and operational barriers physicians encounter after they decide to prescribe a therapy? Do our commercial systems reduce the burden placed on physicians and their staff , or unintentionally add to the complexity of care delivery? Are we benchmarking our engagement against other pharma companies , or against the best experiences physicians encounter in their lives as consumers? Have our investments in digital platforms simplified the physician’s experience, or multiplied the number of disconnected interactions they must manage? Are we still managing performance through activity metrics alone , or beginning to understand the context that ultimately determines whether therapies reach patients? Closing Reflection The pharma and life sciences industry has spent decades refining the mechanics of field execution. Call plans, segmentation models, and targeting systems brought structure and discipline to commercial organizations. Yet the environment surrounding physicians has evolved far more rapidly than the systems built to support them. Healthcare professionals now operate in a world defined by consumer-grade expectations for clarity, responsiveness, and ease. When the experience of engaging with a pharmaceutical company fails to reflect those expectations, the contrast becomes impossible to ignore. Organizations that recognize this shift will redesign their commercial systems around the realities of modern care delivery. They will move beyond managing activity and toward understanding the context in which physicians help patients receive treatment. In doing so they will close the gap between scientific innovation and real-world impact. Your breakthrough science deserves experiences worthy of it. Together, we turn customer excellence into real-world impact. About the Author Wayne Simmons is a hands-on commercial excellence architect and founder of The Customer Excellence Agency, where he partners with pharmaceutical and life sciences leaders to turn customer-centric ambition into durable commercial advantage. He previously served as Global Customer Excellence Lead within Pfizer’s Chief Marketing Organization and has held leadership roles with Bayer Pharmaceuticals and The Ritz-Carlton Leadership Center. Wayne writes The Customer-Centric Marketer newsletter and is the author of The Customer Excellence Enterprise: A Playbook for Creating Customers for Life. The Customer Excellence Agency: Advancing the Pursuit of Excellence in Service of Science.
Tan building with a hanging sign against a clear blue sky
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
Part five of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. Reconstructing the brand pyramid so that experience, not just product, carries the promise.
Coffee shop barista serving drinks behind the counter with menu boards and espresso machines.
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
Part four of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. Why corporate culture stays abstract until it is defined as a platform for delivering the experience.
Industrial-style café with large windows, people seated at tables, and a bright wooden counter
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
Part three of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. What the brand lost when it scaled, and what recapturing its mystique would require.
A starbucks logo is on the screen of a cell phone
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
Part two of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. How a highly successful digital innovation can erode the experience it was built to serve.
Starbucks sign on a beige building against a clear blue sky
By Wayne Simmons • June 12, 2025
The final part of the Starbucks Customer Excellence Series. How an experience delivery system is redesigned so excellence is repeatable rather than heroic.