Pharma Customer Experience: Why It Stalls and What Replaces It
Customer experience in pharma has a credibility problem, and it earned it. Most programs measure how physicians feel and cannot show whether a single patient started therapy sooner. If you run a commercial organization, you have probably funded one of these programs, read the dashboard, and quietly wondered what it was for. This post explains why pharma customer experience stalls, what the companies now moving fastest are doing instead, and how to tell whether your own program is producing value or just reporting sentiment.
Why pharma customer experience keeps stalling
The discipline arrived from retail and banking with its instruments intact. Net promoter scores. Relationship surveys. Journey maps on the wall. The thinking behind them was sound in its home industries, and Bain's Fred Reichheld made the original case in the Harvard Business Review back in 2003. The trouble is what happens when you drop those instruments into pharma. Your customer is a physician who does not think of herself as your customer, a patient who never chose your brand, and a payer who decides whether either of them gets the drug. Sentiment scores tell you almost nothing about whether that chain holds.
Bain itself later added the caveat that goodwill is "a necessary but insufficient condition for generating revenue growth." In pharma that caveat is the whole story. A physician can like your rep, trust your brand and still have a third of her prescriptions for your drug die at the pharmacy counter. Your experience program will not see that happen, because it is not looking there.
The result is a perception gap you can measure. Deloitte's 2025 research found that only 28% of HCPs believe pharma's customer engagement strategies meet their needs, while 82% of life sciences executives are satisfied with those same strategies. That is not a communication problem. It is a measurement problem. The executives are reading instruments that report activity and sentiment, and the physicians are living the experience those instruments miss.
What the experience actually costs you
Start with the number most commercial teams never see. A 2026 study in JAMA, summarized by Johns Hopkins, found that insurer rejections of brand name prescriptions rose from 24.3% of initial attempts in 2018 to 40.7% in 2024, and that 48.4% of rejected prescriptions were never followed by a fill of that drug or any drug in its class within 90 days. Read that twice. Four in ten of your brand prescriptions now hit a wall, and half the patients who hit it walk away.
Physicians see the same thing from the other side. In the American Medical Association's most recent survey, 82% of physicians reported that prior authorization at least sometimes leads patients to abandon treatment, and 93% said it delays care. Cost finishes the job. IQVIA data reported by Managed Healthcare Executive shows that when a prescription's final cost exceeds $250, 61% are never picked up.
None of those failures registers as a customer experience problem in most companies, because they happen after the script is written and the commercial scorecard has already counted a win. We call the gap value leakage. It is where your customer experience program should have been looking all along.
Experience does drive prescribing. The evidence is old and nobody acted on it.
Bain's pharma practice published the clearest version of this in 2018: about 40% of a physician's drug recommendations relate to overall experience rather than product attributes, and physicians who rate a company highly are two to three times more likely to prescribe its products. McKinsey found the same pattern at launch the same year, with prescribers who were fully satisfied with their journey more than twice as likely to prescribe. These findings are seven years old. Most commercial models still allocate nearly all their effort to the product and brand arguments and leave experience to whatever happens.
Meanwhile access is shrinking. Veeva Pulse data reported in May 2024 put the share of HCPs accessible to biopharma at 45%, down from 60% eighteen months earlier. When you get fewer interactions, the quality of each one matters more, not less. DT Consulting's annual benchmark of 6,100 HCPs reached the blunt conclusion in 2024 that pharma's use of engagement channels "continues to be mismatched with HCP preferences."
The companies moving first are not running CX programs. They are rebuilding the commercial system.
Look at what the leaders are actually doing. When Eli Lilly launched LillyDirect in January 2024, David Ricks did not talk about satisfaction. He said the complex U.S. healthcare system "adds to the burdens patients face when managing a chronic disease," and he told NBC that people are used to buying from manufacturers directly online. That is a consumer expectation argument, and Lilly answered it by changing how the product reaches the patient, not by surveying the patient.
Novo Nordisk's CEO Mike Doustdar went further at the 2026 JP Morgan conference, telling Fierce Pharma that the obesity category "acts a lot more as a consumer business than a traditional medication." Novartis launched a direct platform for Cosentyx in September 2025 with its US president Victor Bulto saying the company needs "new ways to reach patients more directly by removing barriers in the system." AstraZeneca followed the same month, with its US president promising "a transparent cash price with the convenience of home delivery." Pfizer's PfizerForAll platform, launched in August 2024, was framed by its chief U.S. commercial officer around the "roadblocks" people encounter when making health decisions.
Notice the pattern. Every one of these moves treats friction, burden and barriers as the enemy, and every one of them changes the system rather than the survey. That is the difference between customer experience as pharma imported it and what we call Customer Excellence: the discipline of designing and running the commercial system so that clinical intent reliably becomes a treated patient.
What good looks like inside a commercial organization
I ran this transition inside a large pharma company, and I have described the logic in CMSWire: we are competing for a standard that our customers bring from the rest of their lives, and we do not get a pass because we are a pharma company. The practical shape of that work has five parts.
First, you stop measuring sentiment as your headline and start measuring progression. Script to start conversion. Time to therapy. Where patients stall. Persistence. Whether barriers get resolved and how fast. Second, you put a name on every handoff between prescription and sustained therapy, because the leak is almost always between functions rather than inside one. Third, you treat your field as an intelligence system. Reps and MSLs encounter barriers weeks before any dashboard does, and most companies throw that signal away. Fourth, you define what happens when a patient stalls, so the fix is a process rather than a favor from your most resourceful rep. Fifth, you hold commercial success accountable past the prescription, which is the one change that makes the other four stick.
Done this way, experience stops being a program and becomes the third element of your value proposition, next to product and brand. Patients and physicians now judge you against the best service they received this week, from an airline or a bank or a pharmacy app. That is the standard we call Consumer-Grade, and the companies above have already decided to compete for it.
Three questions to ask before you fund another CX program
- Can your current experience measurement tell you how many of last quarter's prescriptions became treated patients, and where the rest went?
- Who in your organization owns what happens to a patient between the script and the first dose, and can that person act across functions?
- If your field reported a recurring access barrier tomorrow, how long would it take to change a process, and who would decide?
If the answers are no, nobody, and we do not know, you do not have a customer experience problem. You have a commercial system that ends too early. That is a design problem, and design problems can be fixed.
About the author
Wayne Simmons is the founder of The Customer Excellence AGENCY and the author of The Customer Excellence Enterprise (Wiley, 2024). He is founding faculty of the MS in Customer Experience Management at Michigan State University's Broad College of Business. He led global customer excellence in Pfizer's first Chief Marketing Organization and in Bayer's Customer Powerhouse. Related reading: What is Consumer-Grade Pharma?, What is value leakage in pharma? and What is Customer Excellence in pharma?







